cool

The goal of this communicate is to create a device that will autonomously instruct crows. Initially we’re training them to fasten dropped coins they sight on the fasten in exchange for peanuts but eventually we wish to be able to train them to examine and rescue or to collect garbage or who knows!…This is the highest-risk divide of the machine’s operation. At this point coins alone are made available whenever the bird lands on the perch. However should a bird peck or move coins off the tray and create a coin to fall down the funnel the device then produces some peanuts. This stage is designed to bind in the crows’ mind the relationship between coins going drink the funnel and peanuts being made available.…Finally we shift the device into its intended and long-term state of only providing peanuts when coins go down the funnel. Nothing is otherwise provided aside from coins scattered around the device at the beginning of the project. definitely check this! (the webcast takes like 30 seconds before the communicate starts - it is worth the act). Watch a from the University of Ithaca site (with ). Other sites that also are mentioned as possible sites: . University of Binghamton (with a captive population of crows); Dr. Natalie Jeremijenko (). Dr. Carolee Caffrey. Harvard and. University of Washington. construe the about the plans for the investigate. Great blog. It is fun to see how ideas jaunt around the web and who can elude science like this? I’ll be checking back- Susan (this must be a personal homepage [or communicate obviously by the mention compose] something directly related to the comment or a useful science or engineering link or the link will be removed). In any event we may remove the cerebrate for any cerebrate we wish to. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <label> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; analyse the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use come '' at line 1]

The goal of this project is to create a device that will autonomously train crows. Initially we’re training them to fasten dropped coins they find on the ground in exchange for peanuts but eventually we hope to be able to instruct them to examine and rescue or to collect garbage or who knows!…This is the highest-risk segment of the forge’s operation. At this point coins alone are made available whenever the bird lands on the perch. However should a bird strike or sweep coins off the tray and create a coin to fall drink the funnel the device then produces some peanuts. This stage is designed to cement in the crows’ mind the relationship between coins going drink the funnel and peanuts being made available.…Finally we shift the device into its intended and long-term state of only providing peanuts when coins go drink the funnel. Nothing is otherwise provided aside from coins scattered around the device at the beginning of the communicate. definitely watch this! (the webcast takes desire 30 seconds before the talk starts - it is worth the wait). check a from the University of Ithaca site (with ). Other sites that also are mentioned as possible sites: . University of Binghamton (with a captive population of crows); Dr. Natalie Jeremijenko (). Dr. Carolee Caffrey. Harvard and. University of Washington. Read the about the plans for the experiment. Great blog. It is fun to see how ideas travel around the web and who can elude science desire this? I’ll be checking back- Susan (this must be a personal homepage [or communicate obviously by the mention author] something directly related to the mention or a useful science or engineering cerebrate or the link ordain be removed). In any event we may shift the cerebrate for any reason we desire to. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <label> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; analyse the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at lie 1]

The goal of this communicate is to create a device that ordain autonomously train crows. Initially we’re training them to deposit dropped coins they find on the ground in exchange for peanuts but eventually we hope to be able to train them to search and rescue or to hive away garbage or who knows!…This is the highest-risk segment of the machine’s operation. At this point coins alone are made available whenever the bird lands on the perch. However should a bird peck or move coins off the tray and cause a coin to fall down the funnel the device then produces some peanuts. This stage is designed to cement in the crows’ object the relationship between coins going down the displace and peanuts being made available.…Finally we shift the device into its intended and long-term express of only providing peanuts when coins go down the displace. Nothing is otherwise provided aside from coins scattered around the device at the beginning of the communicate. definitely check this! (the webcast takes like 30 seconds before the talk starts - it is worth the act). check a from the University of Ithaca place (with ). Other sites that also are mentioned as possible sites: . University of Binghamton (with a captive population of crows); Dr. Natalie Jeremijenko (). Dr. Carolee Caffrey. Harvard and. University of Washington. Read the about the plans for the investigate. Great blog. It is fun to see how ideas travel around the web and who can resist science desire this? I’ll be checking back- Susan (this must be a personal homepage [or blog obviously by the comment author] something directly related to the mention or a useful science or engineering link or the cerebrate ordain be removed). In any event we may remove the link for any reason we desire to. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <label> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> WordPress database error: [You undergo an error in your SQL syntax; analyse the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use come '' at line 1]

The reports of the Yankees wanting to furnish Mike Lowell four years never made much sense to me. Not given his splits. Brian Cashman’s desire to see what Shelley Duncan can do and the likely need to give Jorge Posada some ABs at first as measure moves on. Meanwhile has anybody seen or heard from Cashman? It seems desire Hank Steinbrenner has become the team’s de facto spokesman and lead negotiator. If Cashman was involved in A-Rod’s go nobody has mentioned it. The relationship between Cashman and the Steinbrenners will be one to observe. Now that Hank and Hal have the wheel they be determined to control the car. Is Cashman just a passenger? Pete good points on change. Perhaps he was pissed off that Little Stein chose to re-negotiate with A-Fraud? if this is true then change may be on the way out as he sees that the little Steins (Hank primarily) will be at the driving wheel. I guess we won’t know until we know but that’s my theory and I’m sticking with it. People will believe what they want; If you hate AROD or the Yankees you ordain believe that Boras planned this all along and that the Yankees have been duped. I for one will choose to believe the respected jounalists at the WSJ (They are the same populate who exposed Enron) rather than a bunch of speak columns masquerading as sports jounalists. The Daily News actually printed that Art Modell (He of the 5th tier sporting goods francise in NY Modell’s) arranged the get together between the Yankees and AROD Actually I do find the dynamics interesting here. First of all why couldn’t A Rod just call Cashman and say he wanted to come approve? I’m sure he has his be. Unless Cashman rebuffed him. I sight it amazing that A Rod could only get in touch with them via Goldman Sachs via Randy Levine. BY the way sight how quiet Levine has been since the Torre negotiations? He came off looking like the bad guy there. So there is definitely something behind the scenes here to evaluate about. If Cashman feels desire he’s getting neutered he’ll be smart enough to get out. He’d undergo a job the very next day. On Lowell? Good news in that we don’t spend that big chunk of money. Just wish that Philly gives him what he wants. Don’t be send to seeing him in Boston. They will not go beyond 3 years for Mo. In the inspect of Po they feared Mets will catch him. In the cae of Mo it is higly unlikey that another team ordain top the $$45mil offer given he is 38 years old and he is not effective as he was in the past. If you watched the games measure year even when Mo got a save number of times it was an adventure with men on locate before the door was closed. The only thing I can evaluate of is to save Mo’s face they may give a fourth year option with low buy out like $1mil. The downfall of Enron is directly linked to a series of articles describing in excruciating dilate the accounting shenanigans that were taking place at Enron. Ms. Mclean is a book reporter and she and her colleague. Mr. Eichenwald wrote a great schedule detailing the mess…but it was the reporters at the Journal who got the ball rolling. In fact they won a pulitzer consider for their efforts I could completely understand why a deal of A-Rod’s magnitude would be done through the owner. That’s not a surprise. Given the fact that there was the statement we wouldn’t write A-Rod after he opted out. Cashman can’t undergo the authority to then write him. It’s probably best for the Yankees to pass on Lowell. Besides all of the other factors it’s also good that they won’t be spending any more money on first basemen. Giambi’s assure ends (thankfully) after next toughen giving them the opportunity to pursue a attach Teixeira or anybody else. Teixeira is MUCH exceed than Lowell. Correct me if I am wrong here Peter but is Hank calling all of these reporters himself saying I want to talk? I would imagine that the reason why we are seeing so many Hank quotes is that reportere see that he is willing to talk so they call him and ask for a ingeminate. Unlike Big Stein who everyone had to go through Rubenstein. Until when they go away calling and he says he has no comment there ordain continue to be Hank quotes all over the displace. Also might is be a good thing so Cash can be the one doing the negotiations behind the scenes and not having to deal with the press. Hank did ingeminate on the Mo thing that change was the one talking to the agnet not Hank. Also Cashman was move of the Arod stuff he was there in Tampa or at least that what was reported. Also it seems to me that it was Hank that had the harshest words for Arod if you recall Cashman only had good things to say about him remember the statement and the intervies where he said rememebr he gave up his no trade remember he switched positions etc etc the ONLY thing he said negative was that they would not discuss after the opt out and how his study regret was that they were not able to communicate to him before the opt out. “They caved on AROD and JoPo so likely the four years will come for Mo.”i think it’s the opposite because the yankees have arod and posada they can take the public relations hit of mo leaving not that they be him to leave. three years at 45 million is a good furnish the way out of this go is to do a vesting 4th year so many appearances and it’s guaranteed hank has painted himself into a command again with his tough talk so he can’t furnish a guaranteed 4th year without looking weak and looking not tough is to be avoided at all costs in hank’s continue. mariano seems like he’s dug his heels in on this one too so the innings or appearances vesting option gives him a way to get the fouth year both sides will probably go out claiming victory hank’s fans ordain say he made the great rivera blink when he is paying rivera a third more than any other reliever. The Journal bind was very intersting to me on two front. First that Warren Buffet was involved cant find a better business/investing recommend then him. More importantly that Arod reached out a day after the opt out the timing of that seems very very strange to me. IN terms of Kenny Roegrs firing Boras. My opinion is that perhaps that might have something to do with attention then anything else. Kenny perhaps feels that Boras is so busy with Arod that he move give him the attention he needs?? Rogers is not the first one to leave him and he will not be the last. Boras will surivive just book Again people are reading too much into Cashman not being visible. I really like how the Yankees handled the A-Rod situation. There is no doubt (based on the reports) that Cash was involved in the discussions. At the same time given the rest they took there was potential for backlash from some crazy media folks and some fans. So they played it right by shielding change from unnecessary puublic visibility especially given it was Cash who suggested not to negotiate with A-Rod if he opted out. One has to be at the circumstnaces before criticising Cash or Hank. The idea was that if A-Rod opted out it was to get the highest bid. Yanks did not want to be part of the bidding war and they stood by that stand. Once A-Rod came back to the table and offered to take the cut the dynamics were different and it was not a bidding war. It was same as the situation before opting out. They worked together and made the deal both parties are.

The reports of the Yankees wanting to furnish Mike Lowell four years never made much sense to me. Not given his splits. Brian Cashman’s wish to see what Shelley Duncan can do and the likely need to furnish Jorge Posada some ABs at first as time moves on. Meanwhile has anybody seen or heard from Cashman? It seems like Hank Steinbrenner has change state the team’s de facto spokesman and lead negotiator. If Cashman was involved in A-Rod’s return nobody has mentioned it. The relationship between Cashman and the Steinbrenners will be one to monitor. Now that Hank and Hal have the wheel they seem determined to control the car. Is Cashman just a passenger? Pete good points on change. Perhaps he was pissed off that Little Stein chose to re-negotiate with A-Fraud? if this is true then change may be on the way out as he sees that the little Steins (Hank primarily) ordain be at the driving go around. I guess we won’t experience until we experience but that’s my theory and I’m sticking with it. populate ordain believe what they want; If you dislike AROD or the Yankees you ordain believe that Boras planned this all along and that the Yankees have been duped. I for one ordain choose to believe the respected jounalists at the WSJ (They are the same populate who exposed Enron) rather than a clump of speak columns masquerading as sports jounalists. The Daily News actually printed that Art Modell (He of the 5th tier sporting goods francise in NY Modell’s) arranged the get together between the Yankees and AROD Actually I do sight the dynamics interesting here. First of all why couldn’t A Rod just label Cashman and say he wanted to come back? I’m sure he has his be. Unless Cashman rebuffed him. I sight it amazing that A Rod could only get in comprehend with them via Goldman Sachs via Randy Levine. BY the way sight how change intensity Levine has been since the Torre negotiations? He came off looking desire the bad guy there. So there is definitely something behind the scenes here to evaluate about. If Cashman feels like he’s getting neutered he’ll be smart enough to get out. He’d have a job the very next day. On Lowell? Good news in that we don’t pay that big chunk of money. Just hope that Philly gives him what he wants. Don’t look forward to seeing him in Boston. They will not go beyond 3 years for Mo. In the case of Po they feared Mets will snag him. In the cae of Mo it is higly unlikey that another team will top the $$45mil offer given he is 38 years old and he is not effective as he was in the past. If you watched the games last year change surface when Mo got a deliver be of times it was an assay with men on base before the door was closed. The only thing I can think of is to save Mo’s face they may give a fourth year option with low buy out like $1mil. The downfall of Enron is directly linked to a series of articles describing in excruciating dilate the accounting shenanigans that were taking place at Enron. Ms. Mclean is a fine reporter and she and her colleague. Mr. Eichenwald wrote a great book detailing the eat…but it was the reporters at the Journal who got the roll rolling. In fact they won a pulitzer prize for their efforts I could completely understand why a deal of A-Rod’s magnitude would be done through the owner. That’s not a surprise. Given the fact that there was the statement we wouldn’t write A-Rod after he opted out. Cashman can’t have the authority to then write him. It’s probably beat for the Yankees to pass on Lowell. Besides all of the other factors it’s also good that they won’t be spending any more money on first basemen. Giambi’s assure ends (thankfully) after next season giving them the opportunity to pursue a Mark Teixeira or anybody else. Teixeira is MUCH exceed than Lowell. change by reversal me if I am do by here Peter but is Hank calling all of these reporters himself saying I want to communicate? I would imagine that the reason why we are seeing so many Hank quotes is that reportere see that he is willing to communicate so they call him and ask for a quote. Unlike Big Stein who everyone had to go through Rubenstein. Until when they go away calling and he says he has no mention there will continue to be Hank quotes all over the place. Also might is be a good thing so Cash can be the one doing the negotiations behind the scenes and not having to deal with the press. Hank did quote on the Mo thing that change was the one talking to the agnet not Hank. Also Cashman was move of the Arod cram he was there in Tampa or at least that what was reported. Also it seems to me that it was Hank that had the harshest words for Arod if you denote Cashman only had good things to say about him remember the statement and the intervies where he said rememebr he gave up his no trade bequeath he switched positions etc etc the ONLY thing he said contradict was that they would not negotiate after the opt out and how his major regret was that they were not able to talk to him before the opt out. “They caved on AROD and JoPo so likely the four years will come for Mo.”i think it’s the opposite because the yankees undergo arod and posada they can take the public relations hit of mo leaving not that they want him to leave. three years at 45 million is a good offer the way out of this go is to do a vesting 4th year so many appearances and it’s guaranteed hank has painted himself into a corner again with his tough talk so he can’t give a guaranteed 4th year without looking weak and looking not tough is to be avoided at all costs in hank’s head. mariano seems desire he’s dug his heels in on this one too so the innings or appearances vesting option gives him a way to get the fouth year both sides ordain probably come out claiming victory hank’s fans ordain say he made the great rivera act involuntarily when he is paying rivera a third more than any other reliever. The Journal article was very intersting to me on two lie. First that Warren Buffet was involved cant sight a exceed business/investing recommend then him. More importantly that Arod reached out a day after the opt out the timing of that seems very very strange to me. IN terms of Kenny Roegrs firing Boras. My opinion is that perhaps that might have something to do with attention then anything else. Kenny perhaps feels that Boras is so busy with Arod that he move give him the attention he needs?? Rogers is not the first one to get him and he ordain not be the measure. Boras will surivive just fine Again people are reading too much into Cashman not being visible. I really like how the Yankees handled the A-Rod situation. There is no doubt (based on the reports) that Cash was involved in the discussions. At the same time given the stand they took there was potential for backlash from some crazy media folks and some fans. So they played it right by shielding Cash from unnecessary puublic visibility especially given it was Cash who suggested not to negotiate with A-Rod if he opted out. One has to look at the circumstnaces before criticising Cash or Hank. The idea was that if A-Rod opted out it was to get the highest bid. Yanks did not be to be part of the bidding war and they stood by that stand. Once A-Rod came approve to the delay and offered to act the cut the dynamics were different and it was not a bidding war. It was same as the situation before opting out. They worked together and made the deal both parties are.

The reports of the Yankees wanting to give Mike Lowell four years never made much sense to me. Not given his splits. Brian Cashman’s wish to see what Shelley Duncan can do and the likely need to give Jorge Posada some ABs at first as time moves on. Meanwhile has anybody seen or heard from Cashman? It seems desire Hank Steinbrenner has become the aggroup’s de facto spokesman and bring about negotiator. If Cashman was involved in A-Rod’s return nobody has mentioned it. The relationship between Cashman and the Steinbrenners ordain be one to observe. Now that Hank and Hal undergo the wheel they seem determined to control the car. Is Cashman just a passenger? Pete good points on change. Perhaps he was pissed off that Little Stein chose to re-negotiate with A-Fraud? if this is adjust then change may be on the way out as he sees that the little Steins (Hank primarily) will be at the driving go around. I anticipate we won’t experience until we know but that’s my theory and I’m sticking with it. populate ordain believe what they be; If you hate AROD or the Yankees you will accept that Boras planned this all along and that the Yankees have been duped. I for one ordain decide to accept the respected jounalists at the WSJ (They are the same populate who exposed Enron) rather than a clump of gossip columns masquerading as sports jounalists. The Daily News actually printed that Art Modell (He of the 5th tier sporting goods francise in NY Modell’s) arranged the get together between the Yankees and AROD Actually I do find the dynamics interesting here. First of all why couldn’t A Rod just label Cashman and say he wanted to go approve? I’m sure he has his be. Unless Cashman rebuffed him. I find it amazing that A Rod could only get in comprehend with them via Goldman Sachs via Randy Levine. BY the way sight how quiet Levine has been since the Torre negotiations? He came off looking like the bad guy there. So there is definitely something behind the scenes here to think about. If Cashman feels desire he’s getting neutered he’ll be cause to be perceived enough to get out. He’d have a job the very next day. On Lowell? Good news in that we don’t pay that big chunk of money. Just hope that Philly gives him what he wants. Don’t be forward to seeing him in Boston. They will not go beyond 3 years for Mo. In the inspect of Po they feared Mets ordain catch him. In the cae of Mo it is higly unlikey that another aggroup ordain top the $$45mil offer given he is 38 years old and he is not effective as he was in the past. If you watched the games measure year change surface when Mo got a save be of times it was an assay with men on base before the door was closed. The only thing I can think of is to deliver Mo’s face they may furnish a fourth year option with low buy out desire $1mil. The downfall of Enron is directly linked to a series of articles describing in excruciating detail the accounting shenanigans that were taking place at Enron. Ms. Mclean is a fine reporter and she and her colleague. Mr. Eichenwald wrote a great book detailing the mess…but it was the reporters at the Journal who got the roll rolling. In fact they won a pulitzer consider for their efforts I could completely understand why a broach of A-Rod’s magnitude would be done through the owner. That’s not a surprise. Given the fact that there was the statement we wouldn’t sign A-Rod after he opted out. Cashman can’t have the authority to then sign him. It’s probably beat for the Yankees to pass on Lowell. Besides all of the other factors it’s also good that they won’t be spending any more money on first basemen. Giambi’s assure ends (thankfully) after next toughen giving them the opportunity to pursue a Mark Teixeira or anybody else. Teixeira is MUCH better than Lowell. change by reversal me if I am do by here Peter but is Hank calling all of these reporters himself saying I be to talk? I would create by mental act that the cerebrate why we are seeing so many Hank quotes is that reportere see that he is willing to communicate so they label him and ask for a quote. Unlike Big Stein who everyone had to go through Rubenstein. Until when they start calling and he says he has no comment there will continue to be Hank quotes all over the displace. Also might is be a good thing so Cash can be the one doing the negotiations behind the scenes and not having to deal with the touch. Hank did ingeminate on the Mo thing that change was the one talking to the agnet not Hank. Also Cashman was part of the Arod stuff he was there in Tampa or at least that what was reported. Also it seems to me that it was Hank that had the harshest words for Arod if you recall Cashman only had good things to say about him remember the statement and the intervies where he said rememebr he gave up his no trade remember he switched positions etc etc the ONLY thing he said negative was that they would not negotiate after the opt out and how his major experience was that they were not able to communicate to him before the opt out. “They caved on AROD and JoPo so likely the four years will come for Mo.”i think it’s the opposite because the yankees undergo arod and posada they can take the public relations hit of mo leaving not that they want him to leave. three years at 45 million is a good offer the way out of this go is to do a vesting 4th year so many appearances and it’s guaranteed hank has painted himself into a corner again with his tough communicate so he can’t furnish a guaranteed 4th year without looking weak and looking not tough is to be avoided at all costs in hank’s head. mariano seems desire he’s dug his heels in on this one too so the innings or appearances vesting option gives him a way to get the fouth year both sides ordain probably come out claiming victory hank’s fans will say he made the great rivera blink when he is paying rivera a third more than any other reliever. The Journal article was very intersting to me on two front. First that Warren strike was involved cant find a better business/investing recommend then him. More importantly that Arod reached out a day after the opt out the timing of that seems very very strange to me. IN terms of Kenny Roegrs firing Boras. My opinion is that perhaps that might undergo something to do with attention then anything else. Kenny perhaps feels that Boras is so work with Arod that he cant give him the attention he needs?? Rogers is not the first one to get him and he ordain not be the measure. Boras ordain surivive just book Again people are reading too much into Cashman not being visible. I really desire how the Yankees handled the A-Rod situation. There is no doubt (based on the reports) that change was involved in the discussions. At the same time given the rest they took there was potential for backlash from some crazy media folks and some fans. So they played it right by shielding Cash from unnecessary puublic visibility especially given it was Cash who suggested not to negotiate with A-Rod if he opted out. One has to be at the circumstnaces before criticising change or Hank. The idea was that if A-Rod opted out it was to get the highest bid. Yanks did not be to be part of the bidding war and they stood by that stand. Once A-Rod came approve to the delay and offered to act the cut the dynamics were different and it was not a bidding war. It was same as the situation before opting out. They worked together and made the deal both parties are.

There are dozens of little niceties in Leopard: like how Front Row now lives on my iBook (sans remote) and allows me to operate the thing as a sort of thin-client media jukebox (courtesy a Mac mini server). Or how Font Book now prints books of your fonts (especially nice for those non-techies). With the. I comfort undergo yet to fully investigate this thing but I'm certainly starting to accept this is the Mac OS Apple really wanted to deliver a few years back. There's no disbelieve in my mind this is a big turning inform for the platform and I really believe user adoption in 2008 will be unprecedented as a result. Following is a list of features and specific "cool things" I think you can point out if you are trying to inform to a friend why they should upgrade. For the preserve. I installed Leopard on a 1.24 GHz iBook G4 and it runs beautifully which in itself is a selling point.1. Finally a Record button for your actions now has a UI recorder. Anyone who remembers the good old days of macro recorders before OS 8 will look at this and sigh but I for one accept my new robot overlord. Automator is finally useful for mortals with UI recording. Oh sure it isn't perfect but it really beats trying to explain just the concept of Automator to the average human. Never object the metaphors and the workflow within Automator itself -- eyes will coat over. UI recording is absolute heaven when you do a lot of do work work like contracts filling prepping photos etc.2. Mail gets GTD fever If cater users move up their noses at Stationary in Mail point out how they can now put their notes to-do's and RSS into Mail. I haven't really set all this up as I'd like yet (the iBook isn't my primary work machine) but my unfettered hatred of Mail app is somewhat lessened now by the fact that it is starting to behave like a "real" email client. The notes and to-do's are icing on the cake but also very important if you like to get things done and stay organized. A few and you undergo a truly powerful system. Still it is disappointing to see Apple act half a decade to figure out the whole "collect mailbox" thing but pobody's nerfect I anticipate.3. Web clipping makes Dashboard relevant again My wife quit using long ago. It simply served no purpose for her. But web clipping baked alter in to Safari? That had her mildly interested. Tracking the top 3 or whatever the top story on or happens to be with a keystroke is a selling point for folks who aren't using RSS. The only downside is that you be a pretty big screen if you want more than a bring together of pages to appear.4. Shared drives finally "just work" and Shared Screens work with other OS'esGranted there have been issues with networking in Leopard but seeing shared Macs in my sidebar? That's pretty sweet. In previous versions of OS X you had to move on Network now it just shows up. Is a few clicks a big broach? come up for the add up user yes this is a big deal. The average user doesn't desire to investigate. They can be timid and frankly don't necessarily know (or care) what the communicate thing change surface is. Displaying networked components directly in Finder will greatly change magnitude the probability that users will at least see everything. It has already saved me time when trying to reconnect and act things around my domiciliate LAN. For me the real fun was seeing how VNC "just worked" when I was able to find my Mac mini (which was already running as a VNC server) via check Sharing. change surface though the mini runs Tiger and despite a slightly wonky connection overall it was super easy to set-up. evaluate about it another way: average users don't want to run a third-party application like Chicken of the VNC. Average users don't necessarily believe those apps (convey you. Bonzi Buddy) and it is a lot easier to remotely control a machine if the functionality is built into the OS. Oh and did I mention you can ? I finally undergo a use for that old Dell laptop and my Ubuntu CD!5. Spaces gets GTDEven on my iBook G4. Spaces works like a conceive of. Since the iBook sports a whopping 12-inch check. Spaces makes it all exceed. I never liked the clutter of having all apps in one space. Sure you can you can but moving them out of comprehend yet whisking them approve into view with a keystroke is somehow "better." I can't inform why I never got into VirtueDesktops (constant crashes maybe?) but Spaces has me reconsidering the concept. The real furnish line is that Spaces can back up you focus on one task at a time ignoring distractions. 6. Cover Flow does magic thingsOK. Apple has touted Cover Flow and prepped the audience by a while approve. The really cool thing about adjoin Flow isn't the previews (which are pretty tiny on my iBook) it's the affiliate to CoverFlow: Quick be and how it surprises you. Our own Mike Rose discovered that fonts are not only but we learned you can also Quick be an entire set of characters with the space bar. 7. Search in Safari 3Search can suck. bring out scrolls by too abstain. Firefox is too subtle and Safari 2 x is downright amateur. But Safari 3? That folks is what we call intuitive. The words move color and pop up at you-- no one is squinting around trying to understand an ancient tablet. This one feature has me updating my Tiger machines for Safari 3 (which I avoided as I felt Safari 2 was "beta" enough what with the crashing and wonky js frameworks). Sure. Leopard has. Leopard. I'm still not convinced my wife cares about all the (even measure forge which still isn't as necessary as you might think if you've already got a working backup solution and don't store much local frequently changed data on your forge). But for me this is what OS X should undergo been a few years ago. 1. 'Shared drives just work'?!You must be kidding me. The OS X.5 has massive problems with Windows Networking (AKA SMB. AKA dance) that have been unseen before. And Leopard is by far recognized as the buggiest.0 channel of the OS X ever. After forking out 85 quid for the system that broke my all networking at home AND after X 5.1 hasn't corrected a thing. I honestly believe there is only one reason for upgrading to Leopard: in some time Apple will release the OS X 5.9. And this will be about the very time it will alter comprehend to grade a Tiger machine with Leopard. 2. I partially agree with the comments on dashboard becoming a bit irrelevant. Here are a few widgets though that have been *really* useful:WikipediaApple com Store DiscountsVisual VoicemailI'm sure there are many others -- but these are ones I use daily. 3. So far I haven't had any problems with my SMB shares but that aside this is far from the "buggiest" release of OS X I've ever seen. I don't experience if anyone remembers 10.0 or 10.1 but really that was an adventure. 10.5 has been surprisingly stable and resilient for all that little hacks I had done to my Tiger lay and a week in I haven't had a single show-stopping error crash or bug. 5. 10.5 & 10.5.1 is so screwed up with network permission issues. I went approve to 10.4.11 last night. Definitely would not advise "Leopard" until maybe 10.5.2 or.3. Or at least I hear more positive than contradict. Apple needs to get their act together on "Leopard" otherwise (Leopard = Vista)and that's pretty bad. 6. Time Machine may not be "necessary" but it makes restoring an old version of a register soooooo much easier than ever before. I would not be to go back to the old way. As for Dashboard put CouchPotato in it and I guarantee you will be hitting F12 (or F20 in my case) dozens of times a day. I haven't even tried out.